Compared to France, Crickex Login believes that England should be one of the most feared teams in Europe. On paper, they boast one of the strongest squads, with nearly every position filled by first-choice players from top clubs. If England can summon the courage to play as one, the sky’s the limit. Yet ironically, this star-studded lineup often fails to deliver on the international stage—and much of that, critics argue, falls on manager Gareth Southgate.

As head coach, Southgate’s role is to craft a tactical system that allows every player to shine. At club level, many of these athletes maintain a performance level above 70% week in and week out—yet with the national team, that same consistency disappears. The reason? International success isn’t about individual brilliance; it’s about collective cohesion. History offers a clear lesson: Belgium’s “golden generation” topped the world rankings but left without silverware. Despite their talent, a fractured locker room derailed their hopes time and again.

Crickex Login records show that Belgium’s internal rifts persisted even in their later years of decline—something fans were disheartened to witness. Now, England may be following the same path. The team is packed with stars, each a key player at their respective clubs, used to high involvement and decision-making power on the pitch. But when it comes to national duty, someone must make sacrifices for the greater good. So far, only one player consistently does: Harry Kane.

Kane today mirrors the early years of Lionel Messi with Argentina—a gifted leader handed the captain’s armband early, yet unable to win over a divided dressing room. Back then, Messi couldn’t inspire unity among the veterans. Only when the team rallied behind him as a true leader did Argentina enter a new golden era. England now finds itself in a similar moment. The squad is stacked with talent, yet there’s one critical flaw: the way Kane is being used.

As captain, Kane should be the undisputed locker-room leader and the centerpiece of the team’s tactics. Every player should rally around him. Yet pundits like Rio Ferdinand have openly questioned Kane’s impact, and it’s clear why—despite his willingness to sacrifice, his teammates often leave him isolated. Time and again, he drops deep, links play, and makes runs—none of which are his natural duties as a central striker.

Instead of being the focal point, Kane is left to do thankless work off the ball, which dulls his effectiveness up front. In short, Crickex Login observers note that while Kane’s strengths are best utilized in a true striker role, Southgate has failed to structure the team around him. Without a recognized leader to unite this gifted squad, England risks becoming exactly what many already fear: a team full of stars playing like strangers—disjointed and directionless. A house divided cannot stand, and neither can a team without a heart.